CRS报告 IF12240军事战备国防部评估和报告要求

免费文档

VIP文档

ID:29460

大小:0.57 MB

页数:3页

时间:2023-01-10

金币:0

上传者:战必胜
https://crsreports.congress.gov
October 26, 2022
Military Readiness: DOD Assessment and Reporting
Requirements
Military readiness plays an important role in congressional
decision-making on a wide array of national security issues.
To inform its law-making and oversight activities, Congress
requires the Department of Defense (DOD) to regularly
assess and report on the readiness of the armed services.
Defining Readiness
Although readiness lacks a statutory definition, DOD’s
Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms defines it as
“the ability of military forces to fight and meet the demands
of assigned missions.Similarly, Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff Instruction 3100.01E, Joint Strategic
Planning System, refers to readiness as the “ability of the
Joint Force to meet immediate contingency and warfighting
challenges while preparing for future challenges.”
These definitions allow for broad interpretation, but many
analysts use the term more narrowly to refer to the
capability of a given unit or weapon system to successfully
perform the specific functions for which it was designed.
Readiness, according to this usage, represents the military’s
ability to execute national strategy assuming size, structure,
and type of equipment are held constant; it can therefore be
understood largely as a function of manning and training
level (for personnel) or availability and maintenance
condition (for materiel).
This usage, however, does not encompass all the senses in
which DOD or Congress uses the term “readiness.In
addition to the expansive definitions cited above, readiness
is also used to signify specific dimensions of preparedness
(e.g. “operational readiness,” “materiel readiness,”
“medical readiness”). For a more extensive conceptual
discussion of readiness, see CRS Report R46559, The
Fundamentals of Military Readiness.
Comprehensive Readiness
To provide a useful picture of U.S. military readiness as a
whole, Congress requires the Secretary of Defense and the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS) to assess and
report readiness across the armed services regularly.
Secretary of Defense Responsibilities
Title 10, Section 117 of the U.S. Code (U.S.C.) requires the
Secretary of Defense to establish and maintain a uniform
reporting system that measures “in an objective, accurate,
and timely manner” the military’s ability to execute the
National Security Strategy, the Defense Planning Guidance,
and the National Military Strategy. At a minimum, the
system is required to measure unit readiness, training
establishment capability, and defense infrastructure
capability, as well as any “critical warfighting
deficiencies. It must also measure the extent to which the
military is removing parts from one vehicle, vessel, or
aircraft to render a different one operational (sometimes
referred to as ‘cannibalization’).
To meet the requirements of 10 U.S.C. §117, DOD uses the
Defense Readiness Reporting System (DRRS). DRRS
aggregates readiness information and related reporting
submitted by commanders, allowing the analysis of
resourcing and training (‘C-levels’) and mission capability
(‘Y/Q/N assessment’) of units across the services (see
Table 1).
Table 1. DRRS Readiness Ratings and Definitions
Resourcing and Training
Rating
Definition
C-1
The unit possesses the required resources and is trained to
undertake the full wartime mission(s) for which it is
organized or designed.
C-2
The unit possesses the required resources and is trained to
undertake most of the wartime mission(s) for which it is
organized or designed.
C-3
The unit possesses the required resources and is trained to
undertake many, but not all of the wartime mission(s)
for which it is organized or designed.
C-4
The unit requires additional resources or training to
undertake its wartime mission(s), but may be directed to
undertake portions with on-hand resources.
C-5
The unit is undergoing a Service, Combatant Commander,
Agency, or other DOD-directed resource action and is
not prepared to undertake the wartime missions for
which it is organized or designed.
Mission Capability
Rating
Definition
Y
Unit can accomplish the full task to established standards
and conditions.
Q
Unit can accomplish all or most of the task to standard
under most conditions.
N
Unit is unable to accomplish the task to prescribed
standard and conditions at this time.
Source: Government Accountability Office, Military Readiness:
Department of Defense Domain Readiness Varied from Fiscal Year 2017
through Fiscal Year 2019, GAO-21-279, April 2021, pp. 5-6.
资源描述:

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。
关闭