CRS报告 IF11182美国自9 11以来的战争成本、伤亡和人员水平

免费文档

VIP文档

ID:29386

大小:0.35 MB

页数:2页

时间:2023-01-10

金币:0

上传者:战必胜
www.crs.gov | 7-5700
April 18, 2019
U.S. War Costs, Casualties, and Personnel Levels Since 9/11
Seventeen years have passed since the U.S. initiated major
military operations following the September 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks. In the intervening period, operations first
classified as Global War on Terror (GWOT) and later
Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) have varied in
scope. Though primarily focused on locations in
Afghanistan and Iraq, they have also included territories
throughout Central and Southeastern Asia, the Middle East,
and Africa. This In Focus summarizes major expenditures
on U.S. war operations, reconstruction assistance, troop
levels and casualties, and ongoing issues for Congress. This
analysis narrowly defines war/non-war costs as OCO-
designated appropriated funds associated with overseas
operations as designated in DOD’s official “Cost of War
(CoW)” report. Other observers may define war operations
or costs more broadly (see Issues for Congresssection).
Department of Defense War Costs
Congress has appropriated a total of $1.55 trillion in
discretionary amounts to the Department of Defense (DOD)
for war funding since 9/11, according to DOD reporting.
(See following section for OCO non-war expenditures.)
Obligations of those amounts peaked during two surges of
U.S. military activity; first in Iraq in FY2008 ($140 billion),
and then in Afghanistan in FY2011 ($97 billion).
Figure 1. Iraq and Afghanistan: War Spending and
Troop Levels Since 2008
Source: For costs, DOD “Cost of War, September 2018; for troop
levels, FY2020 DOD Comptroller “Defense Budget Request
Overview.”
As a percentage of total OCO-designated obligations, the
two conflicts have been roughly equivalent. Obligations for
operations primarily in Afghanistan represent 49% ($737
billion) overall, while those for Iraq represent 51% ($759
billion).
Over the past three years, obligations for war spending have
averaged $47 billion per year, mostly to fund the operating
support costs of U.S. forces in and around Afghanistan.
Between FY2016-FY2018, the Afghan Security Forces
Fund comprised 9.16% of all obligations for Afghanistan.
In Iraq and Syria, obligations for war fell with the departure
of most U.S. troops in December 2011, but rose again as air
and ground operations against ISIS intensified. Between
FY2016 and FY2018, the U.S. obligated an average of $7.2
billion annually for operations in Iraq and Syria.
DOD Non-War Program Costs
According to DOD reporting, roughly 12% ($.2 trillion) of
all funding appropriated through war-related requests since
9/11 has funded non-war programs. These include
congressional transfers to OCO, funding for the European
Deterrence Initiative, non-DOD classified programs,
adjustments for (non-GWOT) fuel costs, and Army
modularity programs (service restructuring).
Use of the OCO Designation
Estimates of the cumulative costs of war are complicated by
the use of OCO-designated funds for base budget activities.
Under current law, funding designated for emergencies and
overseas contingencies is not counted under budget limits
set annually by congressional budget resolutions. After
passage of the Budget Control Act (BCA) in 2011,
exceeding such budget caps triggers across-the-board cuts
(sequestration) to agency programs.
As a means of complying with the BCA, Congress and the
president have increasingly designated substantial amounts
of funding as OCO to provide for base military activities.
Because of this practice, some argue that OCO has become
a slush fund that obscures the true cost of both war and non-
war spending. Others argue that the OCO designation
affords necessary flexibility to apply funds when and where
needed.
Base and Enduring Requirements
DOD’s FY2020 budget request debuts new OCO funding
categories that identify the requirement for which the
portion of OCO is intended. These requirement categories
include the following:
Direct War Requirements ($25.4 billion; 15%):
Direct combat support and partnership training costs.
OCO for Enduring Requirements ($41.3 billion;
24%): Indirect operational costs likely to remain even
after GWOT combat operations have ended; also funds
European Deterrence Initiative and Ukraine Security
Assistance.
OCO for Base Requirements ($97.9 billion; 56%):
Base funding included to comply with BCA spending
limits.
Emergency Requirements ($9.2 billion; 5%):
Includes $2 billion in disaster relief and $7.2 billion
intended for construction of southwest border wall.
资源描述:

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。
关闭