RAND:当法官更频繁地遵循审前拘留风险评估工具的建议时会发生什么?(2024) 32页

VIP文档

ID:71070

大小:0.24 MB

页数:32页

时间:2024-09-06

金币:10

上传者:PASHU
SHAMENA ANWAR, JOHN ENGBERG, ISAAC M. OPPER, LEAH DION
What Happens When
Judges Follow the
Recommendations of
Pretrial Detention Risk
Assessment Instruments
More Often?
T
he use of artificial intelligence (AI) methods to aid with decisionmaking in the criminal
justice system has widely expanded with the increased use of risk assessments, which are AI
tools that use formal, actuarial, and algorithmic methods to predict future misconduct (Ste-
venson, 2018). Nowhere has this shift been more dramatic than in the widespread adoption
of AI-enabled risk assessment tools to aid in pretrial detention decisions. Until recently, jurisdictions
relied primarily on a money bail system to determine pretrial release, whereby judges set a monetary
bail, and defendants who could not afford to pay were required to remain in jail until their criminal
charges were adjudicated in the courts. To increase fairness, and to reduce overall pretrial detention
rates and ensure that only the riskiest individuals are detained, criminal justice reform efforts have
focused on using risk assessments—in which individuals assessed to be low and medium public
safety risks are recommended for release and individuals assessed to be high-risk are recommended
for detention during the pretrial period—as an alternative to the money bail system. To eliminate
detention disparities based on wealth, pretrial risk assessment tools do not recommend monetary
bail. Roughly half of the counties within the United States currently use a pretrial risk assessment
(Hochstedler Webb, Riley, and Wells, 2023).
The promise of reforming the monetary bail system by using risk assessment tools is substan-
tial; recent studies have shown that moving from a situation in which judges make pretrial release
decisions without consulting the tool to one in which the recommendation of the tool is always
followed would result in many more individuals being released during the pretrial period, with
no negative public safety impacts (Kleinberg et al., 2018; Angelova, Dobbie, and Yang, 2023). For
Research Report
资源描述:

作者调查了预测法官是否遵循审前风险评估建议的因素,并确定了更频繁地遵循建议对审前拘留、公共安全和种族差异的影响。

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文

此文档下载收益归作者所有

当前文档最多预览五页,下载文档查看全文
温馨提示:
1. 部分包含数学公式或PPT动画的文件,查看预览时可能会显示错乱或异常,文件下载后无此问题,请放心下载。
2. 本文档由用户上传,版权归属用户,天天文库负责整理代发布。如果您对本文档版权有争议请及时联系客服。
3. 下载前请仔细阅读文档内容,确认文档内容符合您的需求后进行下载,若出现内容与标题不符可向本站投诉处理。
4. 下载文档时可能由于网络波动等原因无法下载或下载错误,付费完成后未能成功下载的用户请联系客服处理。
关闭